We did not. The point of this study was not to make ICP testing better, it was to help understand results of the hobbyist experience.Thanks @Thales for sharing this study! The mathematical rigor really helps with perspective.
Did you send out sterilized salt water samples?
I wonder if there is a difference between samples that have been sitting in the collection vial for different amounts of time - I usually overnight my tests to ICP-analysis and they test them same day, so that’s 24 hours of “sit” time, vs other samples could feasibly sit in the vial for 2 weeks before testing. I guess it’s hard to predict when a company will measure your sample, but maybe one variable could be removed by either sterilizing the sample or letting the samples sit longer before shipping to the higher turn-around companies?
This is an area of concern for sure. Asking hobbyists to fix a sample comes with problems and expense, so I doubt we are going to see much motion in this area.I’m curious how much phosphate and trace could get fixed by biofilms that form on the sides of the vial or taken up by bacteria/plankton that may then get filtered out before they run the test? (I am assuming there is some mechanical sample filtration prior to ICP testing - or is everything including small particulate matter getting vaporized and counted in the ICP?) I suppose then some of the differences could be explained by different pre-filtering or handling process.