I agree with the logic of feeding a variety of things. However I think sometimes there's logical fallacies in reefing around successes. One of those "if success and did A, therefore A is required or part of success". That's sometimes true, but I think the research it's important to try and separate what someone did that led to success, versus someone getting success despite what they did.
Again, in this instance I believe from a gut standpoint eating a variety of stuff is a great strategy, but would be great to know any rigorous experiments around this stuff. Eg as a counter, doesn't a significant percentage of the fish people eat come from fisheries, and aren't those fish fed pellets?
Again, in this instance I believe from a gut standpoint eating a variety of stuff is a great strategy, but would be great to know any rigorous experiments around this stuff. Eg as a counter, doesn't a significant percentage of the fish people eat come from fisheries, and aren't those fish fed pellets?