1) If the Kessils handle read less PAR is this because the PAR meters are off at that end (in which case Kessil should test everyone with a better meter), or are the boundary lines of the already inexact PAR too narrow for the light our coral uses?
2) While I'd guess it's more even, it is hard to tell from that chart as the maximums are different. I'd rather see it with either the Radion turned down to have the same max as the AP700, or normalize the data.
3) Lack of shimmer may overlap with even distribution, but the two are not 1:1. A wide reflector on a halide does a decent job of evening things out while minimizing overspray, yet still has decent shimmer.
4) I'm not sure PAR differences drove out halides so much as operating cost and the inability to dim. When I let up my reef I looked at going the halide route. I could get over the price of the fixtures, but then having to buy $80 bulbs (Radium 20k) every 8 months. Then I would have had to add blue LED strips which would have put the start-up price about the same as just going full LEDs to begin with, and I would have had to adjust height to dim. Being in TX at the time I would have had to also increase chilling capacity, and then pay a second time as my house AC exported the heat.