Our mission

Bottle Bacteria Breakdowns

Go to Humble.fish. Telegram did a reverse engineering of bottle bacteria. It’s very interesting to see what is actually in it. I would post a link but they posted several threads.
 



There maybe more. But that’s all I see right now.
 
Interesting! I remember people being suspicious of it, in a similar vein of most bottled cures, when it first came out. Interesting seeing the algaecide claim, since it was touted as a bottled bacteria product. Only on page 3 so far, cant wait to finish the whole thread!
 
I’m noticing quoted posts, that I cant find before the posts they were quoted in, making me think they were deleted? Randy holmes farley seems to be very reputable, and someone quoted him, but I cant find his specific post. Verrrrryyyy interesting
 
Interesting! I remember people being suspicious of it, in a similar vein of most bottled cures, when it first came out. Interesting seeing the algaecide claim, since it was touted as a bottled bacteria product. Only on page 3 so far, cant wait to finish the whole thread!
What are you referring to? The bottle bac threads were just posted today and none have more than a couple posts let alone pages.
 
What are you referring to? The bottle bac threads were just posted today and none have more than a couple posts let alone pages.
So I hadnt heard of the humble fish forum before, so I typed it into the browser and saw the “truth about vibrant” post on the front page, thought that was the post that Turkeysammich was referencing. I see that they linked specific posts now
 
These all sound very interesting, but I feel the need to finish the vibrant thread lol. I’ll read these other linked posts after
 



There maybe more. But that’s all I see right now.
So I finally read these posts. I dont know enough about bacteria to know what most of them are or do, but my biggest concern is, I dont see any nitrifying bacteria
 
Ok, using chat gpt was the call, I dont know why I dont use it more, its an amazing tool.

Reading what each organism did really sold the product for me. Nitrifying bacteria, denitrifying bacteria, bacteria that sounded like it works with carbon dosing, enzyme creating bacteria, sounds like all good stuff.

A few of the strains seemed a but sketchy, especially the ones in the KZ product, wouldnt want to be putting my hand in the tank if I used that one lol
 
So I hadnt heard of the humble fish forum before, so I typed it into the browser and saw the “truth about vibrant” post on the front page, thought that was the post that Turkeysammich was referencing. I see that they linked specific posts now
The vibrant reveal story is indeed interesting but it’s old news at this point that it’s a complete fraud. I doubt that is what @Turkeysammich was referring to.

It’s worth remembering not to lump all companies and all products from a company together in the subject of bacteria in a bottle.
 
The vibrant reveal story is indeed interesting but it’s old news at this point that it’s a complete fraud. I doubt that is what @Turkeysammich was referring to.

It’s worth remembering not to lump all companies and all products from a company together in the subject of bacteria in a bottle.
Vibrant had just came out and was being pushed when I started my break, and I havent stayed up to date with everything going on in the hobby. Personally, I wouldnt trust the company that makes vibrant anymore. Not only did people lose corals, but their health as well as their families health were put at risk.

That being said, I absolutely love bottled bacterias, I’ve used dr tims one and only on just about every tank that I have started, and I believe this area has tremendous potential in this hobby. Though the KZ product definitely seems odd, I’d love seeing more data before drawing any conclusions
 
There’s a main thread now. Plus he added other test also.

 
There’s a main thread now. Plus he added other test also.

Pretty disgusting to see so many human pathogens growing in these companies' primary cultures. I've seen brand new interns with better sterile technique. Throwing out my bottle of Zeobak right now.
 
Pretty disgusting to see so many human pathogens growing in these companies' primary cultures. I've seen brand new interns with better sterile technique. Throwing out my bottle of Zeobak right now.
Can someone summarize? I'm guessing I could copy paste the list of bacteria and get something to describe, but I don't really understand what I'm seeing in those lists.
 
Can someone summarize? I'm guessing I could copy paste the list of bacteria and get something to describe, but I don't really understand what I'm seeing in those lists.
1000004895.png

Staph aureus, Strep pneumoniae at pretty large percentages are pretty worrying. Bunch of soil bacteria also. My question would be where are the marine bacteria?
 
Can someone summarize? I'm guessing I could copy paste the list of bacteria and get something to describe, but I don't really understand what I'm seeing in those lists.
Chat gpt did a pretty good job, explained how some are found in soil, some are found in water, some break down waste, some make enzymes, one of the bottled bacterias actually had a fungus in it which was interesting
 
Staphylococcus is not surprising. I doubt there is much in terms of regulating the production of hobby grade products we use unfortunately. I don't see an additive company using a laminar flow hood to bottle each unit for sale anytime in the near future or anything remotely close to USP 797 standards.

It's highly likely some of us reading this thread have Staphylococcus on us now, so the cross contamination risk is high.

Streptococcus worries me tho...especially when adding it to a hospitable environment where it could be aerosolized (skimmer)
 
Back
Top