GreshamH said:
Ah, #2... WAF, very important (Wife Acceptance Factor)
sure you want to bolt it to the wall? Bolting it will hold the stand in place but not necessarily the tank. Most people I trust say not to bolt it and to allow it to move as a unit.
Hmm, from a physics/engineering standpoint, that seems like very strange advice to me.
But of course, some merits. Certainly made me think a bit. See below.
For toppling: Bolting it to the wall is a HUGE advantage here.
For this, you need to look at where your center of gravity is versus the pivot point.
Unbolted, your pivot point is at the floor. (Unless stand can slide, which is very unlikely)
now your center of gravity includes both the tank + stand, but the stand is largely
insignificant, so center of gravity is just a bit below the center of the tank.
So with a 24" tank, 30" stand, your CG is about 40" about pivot.
Bolted, your pivot point is simply at the bottom of the tank, where it touches stand.
So with same example, your CG is only 12" above pivot point.
Very big difference.
For STAND collapsing: Bolting it to the wall is a HUGE advantage here.
Obviously.
And this is one of the most likely failures in my mind.
The stand sure seems like an easy thing to break.
You have a huge sheer force on a box that is mostly built to be strong vertically.
In my 250G case, if the floor moves one way, you have 2000 pounds pushing the other way, due to momentum of tank. T
hat is huge. Plus, even if stand does not break, you have an issue with twisting of the stand.
And that twisting can cause the main tank to crack.
For TANK collapsing: Advantage to not bolting.
Here, it comes down to pressure differences.
Unbolted, things flex, and you get less pressure from the momentum of the water slamming against the sides.
Much like problems if you do not have your aquarium level.
On the other hand, the pressure difference will only be a few inches. It sloshes over the top.
So hard to think it will break, unless it is pretty close to failure already.
For water sloshing out: Advantage to not bolting.
Like above, things move, so less pressure, so less sloshing of water.
So overall, it seems that for a minor quake, it is better to leave it not bolted.
But for a big one, in terms of massive failure, it is better to bolt it.
Risk tradeoff.
So bolted, I have a higher percentage chance of moderate problems, but a lower percentage
chance of total failure.
Other ideas? I am certainly curious.