I've seen a lot of great tanks that ran with little to no skimming.
Yeah, Randy-Holmes Farley had a great article on this awhile back, I’ll see if I can dig it up. Here are the highlights I remember:
- Tanks that tolerate high nutrient loads are usually very mature, 2-3 years old. Most hobbyists don’t get to run their tanks this long before they have to move or suffer a catastrophe requiring a reset.
- Most reef aquarists that “don’t skim” gradually reduced their skimming, but still have a skimmer plumbed in and run it when it’s warranted: minor die-off, chemical treatment requiring additional aeration, pH imbalance, etc. Some only skim after feeding, others only a few hours at night, etc. These details are often not mentioned in a quick post or those that cite “no-skim” tanks aren’t aware of them, but are crucial when considering the actual behavior of successful aquarists as an example.
- Most successful aquarists are doing significant nutrient export that may not get mentioned in a conversation focused on skimming: growing a five gallon bucket of chaeto every month in a refugium 1/4 to 1/2 the size of the DT, massive water changes, using many pounds of bio-media or rubble in a sump, etc. You can see some of this revealed in Jeff’s original FOLR to Reef thread, where I asked how some reefers here can add whole cubes of frozen food to their tanks and not have an algae explosion.
The takeaway for you Jeff is that a balanced, sustainable approach for nutrient export that gets to a steady level of nutrients is better than getting ahead of yourself and over-skimming or doing massive water changes. Slow down man, let the chaeto grow, do smaller water changes, more frequently if needed. The problem you risk now is over-correcting. For example, if you get to undetectable nitrates with huge waterchanges, your chaeto is going to starve and maybe die, making your nitrate problem suddenly worse! Easy does it, make small adjustments from here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk