You almost convinced me to buy automated testers, since I would throw money at
disaster prevention (or detection). Specifically with my 17-day summer vacation planning already underway...
So this is a great point you already made previously when this same topic came up in another post
, and I remember you did even before you made it again, and thought about these benefits.
But are there no
other ways to do this with more reliable equipment in many cases? A great opportunity to explore this.
Going through your scenarios.
1. dosers failing on two part / 2-part containers empty: For alk, this should be visible through the PH testing. CA would be a blindspot but it would also take a while to materialize unless you have a fully stocked SPS tank. So automated CA testing has some merit. I wonder though if the Hydros sole dosing pump would be a better way to be notified when this happens.
2. Your kalk reactor just completely drained into the sump: This should be immediately detectable by a PH swing. No additional tester is needed beyond PH monitoring unless I am missing something.
3. Feed pump stopped working on calcium reactor: I am not using one but from my generic understanding, the reactor would stop working if this happens, lowering CA over time. Same comment as under 1., and more relevant if there is very high CA consumption. However, would it not be more effective to connect the feeder pump to an automated system such as a Hydros XP8 which would alert you if the pump is no longer working?
4. Auto feeder dumped all the contents in the tank: Now this happened to me a little while ago with the AVAST, connected to a KASA wifi plug. My son accidentally tapped on the 'on' icon for the plug (we have many) when swiping away the app on a laggy Amazon Fire tablet which we use for the tank. I have noticed that this happened through an unusual ORP development. So an ORP probe seems to be a better way to detect this and similar issues. I have since connected the AVAST to a Hydros XP8 to hopefully not have this specific issue going forward.
Overall, automated testing could be a cheaper way to detect disasters, but I am not sure if it is the most reliable way to do so. That is my hypothesis so far
.