This assumes alk of 7.7/7.8, which I only referenced from the ICP. You go down your matrix and select alk above 8 and assume I get CO2 down to 500 ppm, N/19, which I did for several days the week before, I should get 8.2, which I do not get with this tank.View attachment 67108
Assuming there's some small error built into your alk result, the PH probe, and the CO2 monitor - I'm not seeing any big mystery here?
This assumes alk of 7.7/7.8, which I only referenced from the ICP. You go down your matrix and select alk above 8 and assume I get CO2 down to 500 ppm, N/19, which I did for several days the week before, I should get 8.2, which I do not get with this tank.
I had alk above 9 (unintentionally) which did not move the needle at all, and potentially links to my issues where I have to dose high amounts of bicarb to reach normal alk levels (probably more than twice the normal amounts).
@Alexander1312 I also have a large skimmer and a ton of surface agitation. It takes my tank several *days* of consistently low CO2 in the air for the PH to normalize at what I would expect to, based on the tables/science.All these values assume that tank CO2 levels are at equilibrium with ambient air. Personally, the first thing I would do is confirm that there is not a gas exchange deficiency in your larger tank before doing anything else.
As I mentioned above, I want to significantly reduce return flow. The reason for this is, in the most simple words, to keep organics and dosed trace elements longer in the display tank before they are filtered and skimmed out, to make them longer bioavailable for corals and bacteria to consume them. This is typically not a concern in a tank with heavy feeding but my tank is rather clean and I feed just enough but not excessive (and I do not intend to change that).
To be able to do that, I replaced my VarioS 6 with a Vario S2. Thanks so much Thomas (@Darkxerox) for the great deal on the pump, and thank you @derek_SR for the immediate assistance with my install issues.
I have had the VarioS 6 on level 2 for the past few weeks, and on level 1 for the past few days. This led to a 1,300 - 1,000 gph theoretical flow, minus the discount on the head pressure/plumbing etc. Below is the chart S6.
View attachment 67299
Now with the switch to the S2, I really wanted to have 1-2 times the hourly tank volume over (150 gallons net). The lowest setting minus the head pressure should get me there. Pump chart below.
View attachment 67298
Yes, this is action no. 1 as mentioned above, and I have already done this.Why don’t you just tune your skimmer down if your goal is to skim less?
This seems like a really roundabout way to accomplish that.
Yes, this is action no. 1 as mentioned above, and I have already done this.
I have set the Reef Octopus Elite 200 INT to level 1 but it is still skimming rather strong - a good example of the downside of an oversized skimmer. I have started pausing skimming for a couple of hours after feeding once a day.
However, it is in combination with the lower flow to increase contact time as stated above - lowering skimming alone is not sufficient.
Main goal is to increase contact time of added food and traces in the display tank. Keep the same water in as long as possible, limited by the water temperature, so it has to turnaround at least once per hour or more frequently to not drop.I wouldn’t turn the pump down if you’re worried about your PH (???). Turn the pump back up and adjust the water level so that you’re skimming very dry.
Your goal is simply to skim out less material, yes?
Turning up the skimmer pump - or down - has 0 impact on PH unless you are getting air for the skimmer from outside.
Everything looks pretty great to me. Regardless of changes, couldn't hurt to dip the torch in oxolinic acid a few times if you see the flesh receding or it not expanding fully. It's hard to over light torches in my experience unless you see it expelling tons of symbiodinium in the afternoon.
Right, that's why we printed and handed out the protocol from Rich stapled to the oxolinic acid at the swap, and why I'm telling Alex to not treat the whole tank but rather the one coral not behaving well.I'd have to strongly disagree on this advice. Recommendations of just dipping in antibiotics is just not sound as it can led to antibiotic resistance. If you plan to treat with antibiotics, run a full treatment of several days to a week (or more) to ensure whatever you're actually trying to kill does go away and doesn't have the opportunity to become resistant to whatever antibiotic you're using.
I'd hate to see people dipping once for a few hours or LFS/wholesalers run low doses of oxolinic acid all the time like everyone does with cipro now. It's bad for us (for antibiotics humans use as well) and bad for coral. Oxolinic acid is slowly becoming one of the last antibiotics we may have as hobbyists as the FDA has been cracking down on "fish" antibiotics at larger pet supply stores. Who knows if they'll just outright start banning any pet supply stores from giving them out without a prescription.
![]()
FDA Warns Nine Manufacturers, Distributors of Unapproved Antimicrobials for Animals
FDA Warns Nine Manufacturers, Distributors of Unapproved Antimicrobials for Animalswww.fda.gov
Right, that's why we printed and handed out the protocol from Rich stapled to the oxolinic acid at the swap, and why I'm telling Alex to not treat the whole tank but rather the one coral not behaving well.
Everything looks pretty great to me. Regardlessi of changes, couldn't hurt to dip the torch in oxolinic acid a few times if you see the flesh receding or it not expanding fully.
I am still super reluctant to use any antibiotics only to save a coral, and will probably not do that.Right, that's why we printed and handed out the protocol from Rich stapled to the oxolinic acid at the swap, and why I'm telling Alex to not treat the whole tank but rather the one coral not behaving well.