Vincerama2
Supporting Member
sfsuphysics said:Bryan, that's a result of proposition 13, it's a reason I get away with paying 1/10th as much in property taxes as my neighbors The difference is that your neighbors bought the house back when the sell price was similar to the average assessed price of homes, where in this case the value they ended up selling for was much less what the average assessed value of properties in that area.
Always wondered if you could transfer property to other people simply by selling for a ridiculously low amount.
First of all, Mike, I hate you. I have a friend who bought his Grandparents home (bought it off his Dad and Uncles). It's in the Richmond District in San Francisco, he pays $700/year for property tax.
If you sell the property, it gets re-assessed ... then you are screwed because it follows current market values. On the flip side, you can ask your county to re-assess your home if it dropped in price to have your property taxes lowered, though it usually doesn't end up as much of a drop. (but something is better than nothing!) The property tax they hit you with is the lower of two amounts. It's the 3% raise per year or it's the re-assessed value...in case your house skyrocketed in value you won't get dinged for re-assessing.
I think the original owner of my house bought it in 1939 for about 45k so that's what 450 (plus 3% per year or whatever) bucks per year property tax?
V