As I like to tell my students, understand what those numbers actually mean that come out of the calculator/computer. Also don't fall into the trap of precision = accuracy. The precision of the Apex is +/- 0.05dKh (claimed) that doesn't mean the accuracy is +/- 0.05dKh. Example, a heater that is set to 78°F but regularly turns on off between 71.5 & 72.5° has a precision of +/-0.05°, it's accuracy on the other hand is something to be desired.
But for giggles lets say it is super factory calibrated and that's also it's accuracy, you're right in how much value you actually put into that. How much can/will it fluctuate between actual measurements (this is where precision is key). That said the precision of my red sea test kit I think is 0.14dKh which is determined solely on my ability to put exactly 0.1mL of solution into a bottle but for me, it's good enough. This is very useful for, as my friend Rich Ross likes to say, help with the lazy, if you don't have to do those tests ever again, AND you know they're being done, AND you're getting multiple readings per day not just weekly/biweekly, it really is a win all around. Maybe in the future for me, step one though, get Apex
Yes I mistyped. I meant precision not accuracy. I've never seen published accuracy numbers for it, but I imagine with the calibration solution you'd be talking no more than .5 dKH. But that's be something to verify with a manual test which you trusted the accuracy on. Ultimately though with Alkalinity precision might matter most given that stability is really what we're striving for i.e. whether you're running at 8.5 dKH or 9 dKH doesn't matter much but sticking to that number likely does.
Ultimately whether it is the Trident or some other automated tester I think it's a step in the right direction if they can get to this level of precision. I base this on the level of human error present in testing coupled with hobby grade kits (and that isn't to say you can't be successful doing manual testing because clearly you can)