What do you guys think about the 2 different aquabiomics tests? One tests bacteria and archaea and the other tests eukaryotes. Each is $99. I guess I find it somewhat annoying that if you are trying to get a picture of what’s going on in your tank or troubleshoot issues, you’d be getting both since you can’t tell which branch of life your microscopic problem is coming from. Anyone have direct experience with them and recommend or not?
I've done both. TankDNA once and microbiome twice.
TankDNA test was done mainly to see if I had uronema present after adding fish. Luckily I've been pretty fortunate and haven't added any fish since. I probably wont be repeating this test, as I didn't find much use for the rest of the data.
I performed the microbiome one twice out of curiosity. When starting my tank i added live rock from Australia, Indo, gulf, Africa, and aquabiomics rubble. Bacteria from IPSF, PNS, Polyplab, TBS sand, and live tripic eden sand were all added around the same time.
The initial results where taken a month after and were pretty underwhelming, given all that was added. After some discussion with Eli, I discovered I would need to allow for more time for the biome to normalize and get a good reading on things, hence why I plan on conducting another test at the one year mark.
Like
@derek_SR stated above, I also found the data in actionable and find myself doing it mostly out of curiosity. Maybe I'm trying to justify what I spent to myself or just trying to see how I've been able to keep and grow acros much earlier with this build compared to my previous systems.
Do I feel its worth $99? Probably not. Would i continue to test at the discounted rate of their BF pricing? I only ordered the one microbiome test and would much rather allocate funds for future test to something more actionable like ICP test kits.