Well I'm going to toss in my own controversy into this, and this goes beyond what's bonus/ultra/rare/whatever.
Unfortunately this is the problem with Jason Fox (or any one who's banking their name on them) corals, if they don't look like what he's selling then IMO they are not as desirable. Now at a swap or store I don't give a flying flip about "lineage" if there's going to be a name associated with it, then it should look how the coral was marketed. Brown acro nub that someone say is Eddie's Purple Monster? "Where's the purple?" Sunset monti that's brown with green polyps, "where's the orange base?" Walt Disney Acro that has some green and yellowish brown to it? I don't care if it's direct from Snow White's castle is Anaheim that's not what I'm getting. And unfortunately that picture of "Goldmeister" doesn't look anything like a "Goldmeister" pictures I just Googled, now I'm not saying it's an "imitation" just saying it's not what's advertised.. "Where's the gold?", maybe it's a photo that doesn't represent what it looks like, maybe it lost coloration, but at the end of the day if someone picks up a "Goldmeister" frag and they get browish with greenspots chalice they might call shenanigans on the member who put that in, doubly so if said member gets a bonus pick out of it.
Just my 2 cents. But I'm old school, we called corals based on the name of the coral or some color that represents what that name is, Green Slimer, Becker Tort, Gorilla Nipple Zoas!!!!!
FYI, at the end of the last swap if memory serves there was some decent feedback on what should/shouldn't be included in the bonus list, some of which was based on observation. Which I think is a great time to do it while it's fresh in everyone's minds. Now I'm not sure if anyone wrote those suggestions down or made changes on the spot but the theory of what was done was good
