Looking in only our own club, I admit I'm not sure if I've seen another tank brand fail here.
@SupraSaltyReefer I don't think the 'sales rate to failure rate' argument holds water. Being very generous, 9 of every 10 tanks I see fail online are Red Sea. The plural of anecdote is not data, but this seems to be in line with most others' experiences. Taking this assumption at face value, assuming that Red Sea does not have a higher failure rate than other brands requires some combination of the following to be true:
1. That people are under-reporting failures from other brands online (which I highly doubt, because tank failures are A Big Effing Deal), and/or
2. That, given 1 "other" tank fails for every 9 Red Sea tanks, Red Sea is outselling/installing
literally every other tank brand combined 9 times over
It's also important to note that the above is the bare minimum for Red Sea to simply be "normalized" with failure rates on other aquarium brands. Coupled this with the fact they've already had issues with poor tank support in the past (see the provision of the extra reinforcement bracket some years ago). Add on the fact that two of the primary value propositions they listed for the G2 tanks in their initial marketing were "armored seams" and "reinforced seams." This last point is salient to me, as I work in marketing, and this is *exactly* how I would have tried to smooth over customer concerns about seam failures while not admitting there was a problem.
Don't get me wrong - I'm really happy for you that you haven't had any issues with your Red Sea aquariums, and I hope you continue to not have problems. But I think this is very much a "Red Sea" problem, not a "distorted data" problem, especially given how horrendous the customer support is.