Our mission

Gimmito's 450 gal L-shaped tank

Dwell time and size of uv sterilizer to the tank are two big factors. He did mention you would need a rather large uv sterilizer to the size of the tank to have much of an effect on free floating parasites. He did not go into detail regarding QT's, but rather main displays. He also wasn't a fan of ozone use in the home aquaria due to safety concerns.

If you need some frags, I could frag some nuclear green & AOG palys, neon green toadstool, & green w/purple tips frog spawn for your main display if you like.... LMK.
 
Jeremy,

I've heard of folks who have QT's who just feed constantly and are agressive w/water changes. I've also heard of folks who will use the water from the main display and alternate w/fresh water changes also. What method do you do ?
 
I use ozone in my Jacuzzi, which is outside, and it works well. For what little that is worth.
Supposedly helps increase skimmer effectiveness, until you overdose, in which case it works less.
(A way to tell if you are over-dosing)
Disintegrates rubber o-rings.
I do not plan on using either ozone or UV in my main display.

I will need a ton of frags.....someday .. hopefully soon. :)
I will definitely hit you up on that when my new tank is stable. Thanks.
 
I know ozone does help skimmer production and gives you crystal clear water. Although, it does breakdown o-rings and eventually acrylic, not to mention can be hazardous to your health.

On a side note, I had a reef hobbist recommend ditching the skimmer and go with the ATS system....he claims he feeds 3 times a day and hasn't done a water change in 7 months. Of course I thought of you, but you are upfront with the pro's and con's of the ATS system.
 
gimmito said:
xcaret said:
Full tank shot !! (even that is still empty)

photo-131.jpg

This is not a FTS. This is more like 3/4TS. Your tank is too BIG to take a FTS :p
 
gimmito said:
Jeremy,

I've heard of folks who have QT's who just feed constantly and are agressive w/water changes. I've also heard of folks who will use the water from the main display and alternate w/fresh water changes also. What method do you do ?


I buy happy fish and make them even happier, if something happens (Ich, Brook etc.), I make sure that they're in a tank where they can easily and in the most stress free way possible can be removed and dipped.

I'm fine with meds in QT, but for me it's not practical, besides meds can really stress out fish. Hypo is an option, but bringing up the salinity is stressful as well, which leads back to the happy fish comment :)
 
gimmito said:
On a side note, I had a reef hobbist recommend ditching the skimmer and go with the ATS system....he claims he feeds 3 times a day and hasn't done a water change in 7 months. Of course I thought of you, but you are upfront with the pro's and con's of the ATS system.

Yes, beware of over-hyping on ATS systems. What he says can be done, but is very tricky.

Everything has its use, and I actually think you should think about a turf scrubber as well.
They are GREAT at naturally removing Phosphate, and Nitrate!
Skimmers do NOT remove those. Not a bit. Only chemicals and anaerobic bacteria do.
I think an ATS is much better than complex denitrators/phosban/etc.

But my advice is to only do it once things are up and running, and you feel like tinkering.

I still run a skimmer (small), and do water changes (but less).
And yes, I have algae problems.

Another option is to put one on the QT tank. They eat ammonia/nitrite as well, and a QT tank
never has the time to properly cycle.
 
rygh said:
gimmito said:
On a side note, I had a reef hobbist recommend ditching the skimmer and go with the ATS system....he claims he feeds 3 times a day and hasn't done a water change in 7 months. Of course I thought of you, but you are upfront with the pro's and con's of the ATS system.

Yes, beware of over-hyping on ATS systems. What he says can be done, but is very tricky.

Everything has its use, and I actually think you should think about a turf scrubber as well.
They are GREAT at naturally removing Phosphate, and Nitrate!
Skimmers do NOT remove those. Not a bit. Only chemicals and anaerobic bacteria do.
I think an ATS is much better than complex denitrators/phosban/etc.

But my advice is to only do it once things are up and running, and you feel like tinkering.

I still run a skimmer (small), and do water changes (but less).
And yes, I have algae problems.

Another option is to put one on the QT tank. They eat ammonia/nitrite as well, and a QT tank
never has the time to properly cycle.


Skimmers do not remove No3 or PO4 true, however (and this is a big however), they remove the precursors. Two tanks run with the exact same equipment except one has a skimmer one doesn't; the tank with the skimmer is going to have significantly lower NO3 and PO4 levels.

Also, running an ATS system can have some serious adverse affects when you are keeping more sensitive stony corals. Micro algae like many organisms produce aleopathic compounds that can not only inhibit growth, they can grind your tank to a halt. At that point you need to compensate by running a ton of carbon. I've run ATS systems in the past (15-20 years ago) and have no urge to go back, not only did I not get the results I do using a skimmer, the skimmer actually requires much less servicing.
 
tuberider said:
rygh said:
gimmito said:
On a side note, I had a reef hobbist recommend ditching the skimmer and go with the ATS system....he claims he feeds 3 times a day and hasn't done a water change in 7 months. Of course I thought of you, but you are upfront with the pro's and con's of the ATS system.

Yes, beware of over-hyping on ATS systems. What he says can be done, but is very tricky.

Everything has its use, and I actually think you should think about a turf scrubber as well.
They are GREAT at naturally removing Phosphate, and Nitrate!
Skimmers do NOT remove those. Not a bit. Only chemicals and anaerobic bacteria do.
I think an ATS is much better than complex denitrators/phosban/etc.

But my advice is to only do it once things are up and running, and you feel like tinkering.

I still run a skimmer (small), and do water changes (but less).
And yes, I have algae problems.

Another option is to put one on the QT tank. They eat ammonia/nitrite as well, and a QT tank
never has the time to properly cycle.


Skimmers do not remove No3 or PO4 true, however (and this is a big however), they remove the precursors. Two tanks run with the exact same equipment except one has a skimmer one doesn't; the tank with the skimmer is going to have significantly lower NO3 and PO4 levels.

Also, running an ATS system can have some serious adverse affects when you are keeping more sensitive stony corals. Micro algae like many organisms produce aleopathic compounds that can not only inhibit growth, they can grind your tank to a halt. At that point you need to compensate by running a ton of carbon. I've run ATS systems in the past (15-20 years ago) and have no urge to go back, not only did I not get the results I do using a skimmer, the skimmer actually requires much less servicing.

Well, skimmers remove some of the precursors. Not the fish pee ones. :)
My personal preference is to use both ATS + Skimmer.
Skimmer gets a lot, then bacteria + ATS get the rest.

If you needed carbon, that probably means you were not cleaning the ATS often enough, or it was too small.
Since the scrubber is a fairly flat plate, the underlying algae can get grown over quickly, then die.
This is especially bad if your system has a lot of Nitrates, and a small ATS.
As it dies, it releases a mess of chemicals. Plus, it often starts to grow Cyano, which also dies.
A cascade of problem.
That is what causes a lot of the failures. Did for me at first as well.
If you clean them every 7 days religiously, and have a decent sized one, not an issue.
Properly running ATS generally grow hair algae, which are macro, and we have plenty of that in our tanks anyway.

Not sure why ATS servicing is an issue. Scrape off the algae every Sunday. Done.
I usually clean my skimmer twice a week, and it takes longer.
Depends on the design I guess.
 
Jeremy,

I'm running skimmers on all the systems. Carbon on the main display + either gfo or bio pellets. What do you recommend to run on the frag tank and quarantine tank ?
 
rygh said:
tuberider said:
rygh said:
gimmito said:
On a side note, I had a reef hobbist recommend ditching the skimmer and go with the ATS system....he claims he feeds 3 times a day and hasn't done a water change in 7 months. Of course I thought of you, but you are upfront with the pro's and con's of the ATS system.

Yes, beware of over-hyping on ATS systems. What he says can be done, but is very tricky.

Everything has its use, and I actually think you should think about a turf scrubber as well.
They are GREAT at naturally removing Phosphate, and Nitrate!
Skimmers do NOT remove those. Not a bit. Only chemicals and anaerobic bacteria do.
I think an ATS is much better than complex denitrators/phosban/etc.

But my advice is to only do it once things are up and running, and you feel like tinkering.

I still run a skimmer (small), and do water changes (but less).
And yes, I have algae problems.

Another option is to put one on the QT tank. They eat ammonia/nitrite as well, and a QT tank
never has the time to properly cycle.


Skimmers do not remove No3 or PO4 true, however (and this is a big however), they remove the precursors. Two tanks run with the exact same equipment except one has a skimmer one doesn't; the tank with the skimmer is going to have significantly lower NO3 and PO4 levels.

Also, running an ATS system can have some serious adverse affects when you are keeping more sensitive stony corals. Micro algae like many organisms produce aleopathic compounds that can not only inhibit growth, they can grind your tank to a halt. At that point you need to compensate by running a ton of carbon. I've run ATS systems in the past (15-20 years ago) and have no urge to go back, not only did I not get the results I do using a skimmer, the skimmer actually requires much less servicing.

Well, skimmers remove some of the precursors. Not the fish pee ones. :)
My personal preference is to use both ATS + Skimmer.
Skimmer gets a lot, then bacteria + ATS get the rest.

If you needed carbon, that probably means you were not cleaning the ATS often enough, or it was too small.
Since the scrubber is a fairly flat plate, the underlying algae can get grown over quickly, then die.
This is especially bad if your system has a lot of Nitrates, and a small ATS.
As it dies, it releases a mess of chemicals. Plus, it often starts to grow Cyano, which also dies.
A cascade of problem.
That is what causes a lot of the failures. Did for me at first as well.
If you clean them every 7 days religiously, and have a decent sized one, not an issue.
Properly running ATS generally grow hair algae, which are macro, and we have plenty of that in our tanks anyway.

Not sure why ATS servicing is an issue. Scrape off the algae every Sunday. Done.
I usually clean my skimmer twice a week, and it takes longer.
Depends on the design I guess.


You need carbon to remove the aleopthic compounds, I thought I was pretty clear on that.

IME cleaning a collection cup is easier than scrubbing algae off of a perforated surface.

Besides who says skimmers do not remove fish waste? It's a skimmer, not a "protein" skimmer they remove more than the DOC.
 
gimmito said:
Jeremy,

I'm running skimmers on all the systems. Carbon on the main display + either gfo or bio pellets. What do you recommend to run on the frag tank and quarantine tank ?

The frag tank would be fine with the triad of GFO, skimming, and a small fuge.

QT, a skimmer and a reactor that would be used to run carbon/cuprisorb or whatever chemical media you need depending on what you are QTing, no fuge and no real need for GFO since I assume you'll be running it as a FO tank.
 
tuberider said:
You need carbon to remove the aleopthic compounds, I thought I was pretty clear on that.
You were clear. I am just saying a lot of people with ATS systems would disagree, and I was simply trying
to list a few other possible reasons that your ATS attempt did not go well.

tuberider said:
Besides who says skimmers do not remove fish waste? It's a skimmer, not a "protein" skimmer they remove more than the DOC.
Skimmers only get rid of hydrophobic and some amphipathic molecules. Ammonia is hydrophlic, so will not be touched.

At any rate, best not to derail Gimmito's thread on rather obscure ATS info / argument on it.
For those that want more info, there is a ton of info here (Although decidedly pro-ATS, so beware the hype)
http://www.algaescrubber.net
 
One last post on the subject:

"Foam fractionation removes DOC by two mechanisms: (1) surface active materials are adsorbed physically at the surfaces of rising air bubbles in a contact column; and (2) non-surface active compounds may combine chemically with surface-active material and be collected." Rubin (1963)

"Many surface active fractions of the DOC can be concentrated and removed in foam produced by foam fractionation. This process is also called airstripping and protein skimming; the latter being inaccurate in implying that only proteinaceous substances are removed." Spotte (1976)

"Foam fractionation contactors also remove some of the particulate organic carbon by entrapment in the foam and are an auxiliary mechanical filtration technique". Schlesner and Rheinheimer (1974)

Skimmers do a lot more than you think, sure they may not extract pure NH3, but they can strip out NH3 producing compounds without the chemical warfare.
 
Side topic, (as if this thread was on topic anyway)
Regarding the chemical warfare and aleopthic compounds, what are your thoughts on Cheato/Caulerpa?
 
Back
Top